Comparison with i18next
i18next is a widely used internationalization framework designed specifically for JavaScript applications. Both i18next and Lingui are popular libraries for translating and localizing JavaScript-based projects, each offering unique strengths and features.
The choice between them ultimately depends on the specific needs of your project.
Basic Comparison
Here's a simple example of how to use i18next:
import i18next from "i18next";
i18next.init({
lng: "en",
resources: {
en: {
translation: {
key: "Hello world",
},
},
},
});
import i18next from "i18next";
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML = i18next.t("key");
The equivalent example with Lingui looks like this:
import { defineConfig } from "@lingui/cli";
export default defineConfig({
sourceLocale: "en",
locales: ["en", "cs", "fr"],
catalogs: [
{
path: "<rootDir>/src/locales/{locale}/messages",
include: ["src"],
},
],
});
import { t } from "@lingui/core/macro";
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML = t`Hello world`;
This example uses a macro for the translation. Macros are a powerful feature of Lingui that allows you to write messages directly in your code. Read more about Macros.
If you prefer to define explicit IDs for your messages, you can follow this approach:
import { t } from "@lingui/core/macro";
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML = t({ id: "msg.greeting", message: `Hello World` });
Read more about Explicit vs Generated Message IDs.
Interpolation
Interpolation is a key internationalization (i18n) feature that allows you to insert dynamic values into your translations. Both Lingui and i18next support interpolation.
i18next sample:
import i18next from "i18next";
i18next.t("My name is {name}", { name: "Tom" });
i18next.t("msg.name", { name: "Tom" });
Lingui sample:
import { t } from "@lingui/core/macro";
const name = "Tom";
t`My name is ${name}`;
t({ id: "msg.name", message: `My name is ${name}` });
Formatting
Both Lingui and i18next formatting functions are based on the Intl API.
Numbers
i18next sample:
import i18next from "i18next";
i18next.t("intlNumber", { val: 1000 });
// --> Some 1,000
i18next.t("intlNumber", { val: 1000.1, minimumFractionDigits: 3 });
// --> Some 1,000.100
i18next.t("intlNumber", { val: 1000.1, formatParams: { val: { minimumFractionDigits: 3 } } });
// --> Some 1,000.100
i18next.t("intlNumberWithOptions", { val: 2000 });
// --> Some 2,000.00
i18next.t("intlNumberWithOptions", { val: 2000, minimumFractionDigits: 3 });
// --> Some 2,000.000
Lingui sample:
import { i18n } from "@lingui/core";
i18n.activate("en");
i18n.number(12345.678);
// Returns "12,345.678"
i18n.number(12345.678, { style: "currency", currency: "USD" });
// Returns "$12,345.68"
i18n.activate("cs");
i18n.number(12345.678);
// Returns "12 345,678"
i18n.number(12345.678, { style: "currency", currency: "CZK" });
// Returns "12 345,68 Kč"
DateTime
i18next sample:
import i18next from "i18next";
i18next.t("intlDateTime", { val: new Date(Date.UTC(2012, 11, 20, 3, 0, 0)) });
// --> On the 12/20/2012
i18next.t("intlDateTime", {
val: new Date(Date.UTC(2012, 11, 20, 3, 0, 0)),
formatParams: {
val: { weekday: "long", year: "numeric", month: "long", day: "numeric" },
},
});
// --> On the Thursday, December 20, 2012
Lingui sample:
import { i18n } from "@lingui/core";
const d = new Date("2021-07-23T16:23:00");
i18n.activate("en");
i18n.date(d);
// Returns "7/23/2021"
i18n.date(d, { timeStyle: "medium" });
// Returns "4:23:00 PM"
i18n.date(d, { dateStyle: "medium", timeStyle: "medium" });
// Returns "Jul 23, 2021, 4:23:00 PM"
Plurals
Lingui uses the ICU MessageFormat syntax to handle plurals. It provides a simple and translator-friendly approach to plurals localization.
For example:
plural(numBooks, {
one: "# book",
other: "# books",
});
Under the hood, the plural
macro is replaced with a low-level i18n._
call. In production, the example will look like this:
i18n._({
id: "d1wX4r",
// stripped on production
// message: '{numBooks, plural, one {# book} other {# books}}',
values: { numBooks },
});
When we extract messages from the source code using the Lingui CLI, we get:
i18next handles plurals differently. It requires a separate key to be defined for each plural form. This is not translator-friendly, lacks context, and is prone to errors:
{
"key_one": "item",
"key_other": "items"
}
import i18next from "i18next";
i18next.t("key", { count: 0 }); // -> "items"
i18next.t("key", { count: 1 }); // -> "item"
i18next.t("key", { count: 5 }); // -> "items"
Context
By providing context, you can differentiate translations for the same sentences or provide translators with more details. Both i18next and Lingui have the context feature to differentiate messages.
i18next sample:
import i18next from "i18next";
i18next.t("Right", { context: "direction" });
Lingui sample:
import { msg } from "@lingui/core/macro";
msg({
message: "Right",
context: "direction",
});
Lingui automatically provides additional context by including in the .po
file the locations where each message is used, and msgctxt
if the context is specified. This is useful for translators to understand the context of the message:
#: src/App.js:5
msgctxt "direction"
msgid "Right"
msgstr "Right"
i18next can't do this from its plain JSON files.
React Integration
Both libraries provide React components for handling translations in React applications. Lingui provides a set of React Macros that simplify writing messages directly in your code. i18next provides a Trans
component to handle translations in JSX.
i18next sample:
import { Trans } from "react-i18next";
const HelloWorld = () => {
return <Trans i18nKey="welcome">Hello World!</Trans>;
};
Lingui sample:
import { Trans } from "@lingui/react/macro";
const HelloWorld = () => {
return <Trans>Hello World!</Trans>;
};
Summary
This is a rather brief comparison. Both libraries have quite different concepts, but at the same time the core internationalization approaches are similar and use the same background.
On top of that, Lingui:
- Supports rich-text messages.
- Provides macros to simplify writing messages directly in your code.
- Provides a CLI tool for extracting and compiling messages.
- Supports a number of Catalog Formats, including Custom Formatters.
- Is small, fast and flexible. It also has a small bundle footprint by stripping unused messages and loading only necessary catalogs.
- Works with vanilla JS, React (including RSC), Next.js, Node.js, Vue.js etc.
- Is actively maintained.
On the other hand, i18next:
- Uses a key-based approach for translation management.
- Is mature. Based on how long i18next has been open source, there is no real i18n case that cannot be solved with i18next.
- Is extensible, with many plugins and tools developed by other contributors, including extractors, locale identifiers, etc.
- Has a big ecosystem.
In conclusion, Lingui is an excellent option for projects that need modern and efficient translation methods, support for popular frameworks, and effective translation management tools. However, the choice between Lingui and i18next ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your project.